Re: 3Q 2006 Wireless Carrier Results On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 00:04:54 GMT, decaturtxcowboy
<nope_none_@nowayspam.com> wrote in
<Gyt5h.7061$yl4.2313@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com> :
>SMS wrote:
>> because even if Sprint and T-Mobile could get
>> approval for sufficient towers to equal the coverage of Cingular and
>> Verizon, the cost of putting in so many towers would hurt their margins.
>
>Getting approval is pretty much a trivial task now. Planning commissions
>and home owners have no more recourses to deny an application.
Correct.
--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ> |