View Single Post
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 11-12-2006, 11:40 PM
Curtis R Anderson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 3Q 2006 Wireless Carrier Results

Yakov Chiu wrote:
> decaturtxcowboy wrote:
>
>> Getting approval is pretty much a trivial task now. Planning
>> commissions and home owners have no more recourses to deny an
>> application.

>
>
> What the planning commission can't do, is to deny a cell tower permit on
> the basis of the alleged _health effects_. That's all that the
> Telecommunications Act of 1996 states. There are plenty of other reasons
> to deny a permit, including asthetics, that are still fair game for
> denying a permit.


One healt effect, for example, was one family in the Chautauqua County,
NY town of Kiantone tried to block American Tower from putting up a 250'
free-standing cell tower, claiming their child's cochlear implants would
squeal and be otherwise painful. The court allowed the tower to go up
anyway, like they were supposed to.

I think of _Star Trek II_ logic here: "The needs of the many [who drive
around and may have a breakdown] outweigh the needs of the few [who have
ear implants]."

I was driving in the area some time ago and noticed VZW had a nice
strong signal off the tower.
--
Curtis R. Anderson, Co-creator of "Gleepy the Hen", still
"In Heaven there is no beer / That's why we drink it here ..."
http://www.gleepy.net/ mailto:gleepy@intelligencia.com
mailto:gleepy@gleepy.net (and others) Yahoo!: gleepythehen

Reply With Quote