Dennis Ferguson wrote:
> Yes, this is correct, the frequency-dependent component of free space
> path loss is really just a fiction. It is, however, a useful fiction
> since it lets you talk about path losses and antenna gains (over isotropic)
> as if they were independent issues instead of just a single issue related
> to how antennas work.

Oh really....

How do you explain is greater path loss at 5.8 GHz than 2.4 GHz?