John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote in
news:u60kl29ltaietred7fu38qjoen09j7lv8k@4ax.com:

> On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:04:01 -0700, Todd Allcock
> <ElecConnec@AmericaOnLine.com> wrote in
> <4559ea42$0$21093$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>:
>

>
>>And, franlky, I'm not sure your implied "Verizon's coverage is better
>>now, but might be downgraded to Cingular's level in a few years when
>>AMPS is phased out" is exactly the cloth that sales brochures are cut
>>from!
>
> I said nothing of the kind. Cingular actually has better overall
> coverage than Verizon here in the San Francisco Bay Area.
>

According to who?