thats true what your saying then something is wrong, should not be that
much to be honest ;-) (normally get 80 - 250 something in downloading,
depends logically on the other sider too)

I would change my provider if I am not happy with them

Omiwahn


M.Dexter@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:

> On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 23:45:15 +0000, Omiwahn <omiwahn@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> >M.Dexter@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
> >> On 9 Nov 2006 01:51:56 -0800, "Xeonwales" <cpritcharduk@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Not true, i work for NTL:Telewest, and they are changing things BIG
> >>> TIME!!
> >> But they are still trying to run before they can walk they talk of
> >> providing 50Mb Internet connections God in heaven I shall be pleased
> >> when they manage to provide me with the 4Mb which I am paying for and
> >> not getting many people in my area have the same problem he is paying
> >> for 10MB and only getting 5 .
> >> I prefer BY to ADFSL providers but it is time
> >> Telewest/Blueyonder/NTL/ Virgin or whatever else they decide to call
> >> themselves next week got their finger out and provided the service
> >> which customers are paying for .
> >
> >Hey Ho,
> >
> >I am quite happy with my 4 Mbit connection from telewest but maybe I
> >also take the "up to" (wich is standing on the telewest site directly
> >next to the offer)in consideration.
> Well now so this "up to" which you speak of means that a guy who is
> paying for a 10Mb connection in my area and many of us who are on 4Mb
> have to expect our speed to be cut by half EVERY SODDING NIGHT does
> it ? . And considering that a second level support supervisor last
> night told me after some checking that two out of the three UBR's in
> this area are grossly over subscribed and he could not offer any time
> scale when the problem will be fixed , I actually think you are
> totally wrong with your "UP TO" nonsense .
> We all know about " up to" god we have had it rammed down our throats
> often enough by support personnel but when you are getting download
> speeds of around 80 to 102 k/sec when even allowing for "Up TO'S a
> speed of 400k/sec should be obtained even support say there is
> something wrong .