Re: extending range: torn between "expensive but supposedly safe" and "risky, but cheap and geekishly rewarding" John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
<snip>
> Instead of a simple repeater you can use a wireless Ethernet bridge
> (that can support enough clients) cabled to a wireless access point on a
> different non-overlapping channel; i.e.,
What sort of router are you assuming the Wi-Fi Router is? This router
(which the OP already has) will have to share bandwidth amongst stations
connecting directly with this router as well as the bridge. |