Re: extending range: torn between "expensive but supposedly safe" and "risky, but cheap and geekishly rewarding" "Swann" <swann@tempsperdu.fr> wrote in
news:ejff70$rht$1@registered.motzarella.org:
> "DanS" <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@a.d.e.l.p.h.i.a.n.e.t> ha scritto nel
> messaggio news:Xns987C4CD869CC6thisnthatadelphianet@216.196. 97.142...
>>>
>>> cannot. it has to stay in the living room because it also needs to
>>> be wired to the tv set. besides, we changed the phone lines and the
>>> router must now dial from the main socket, which is in that room.
>>>
>>
>> Confusing. Is this a cable modem or a DSL modem ?
>
> DSL. but they also bring voip and some tv channels over it.
>
> Swann
>
>
So it's a combo DSL modem/IP Phone/Wireless Router/IP TV box ?
That's just stupid. Just another instance in which you can see you are
better off with individual components, if this indeed as I describe it. |