View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2005, 01:09 PM
Andrew Gabriel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OT: Why downgrade spa-3000?

In article <3k43teFs1m45U1@individual.net>,
"Lee" <me@privacy.net> writes:
>
> "Andrew Gabriel" <andrew@cucumber.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:42dba60a$0$38044$5a6aecb4@news.aaisp.net.uk.. .
>> Much to my surprise, upgrading (and then downgrading again)
>> my sipura spa-3000 didn't lose any settings.

>
> Out of interest - why did you downgrade?


The version 3 firmware introduced and fault whereby all the
syslog messages are missing the PRI header so they aren't
usable. In the version 2 firmware, most of the syslog messages
are more correctly formed (a few only are missing the PRI header
and unusable).

Also, the version 3 firmware didn't fix the TCP window handling
problem which was the main reason for trying the upgrade. This
prevents the browser interface working properly when the browser
system advertises a large TCP window (i.e. probably something
over 32k, but not window scaling), and it is running across a WAN
or sufficient routers such that more than 32k of data gets
buffered across the network. It looks to me like the spa-3000 is
perhaps tripping on some associated 16bit arithmetic which needs
to be 32 bit arithmetic, screwing up its TCP sequence calculations,
and gets stuck in a TCP restransmit loop. If you have control of
the TCP window advertised from the browser system, knocking it
down to 20k is a workaround.

--
Andrew Gabriel

Reply With Quote