Re: extending range: torn between "expensive but supposedly safe" and "risky, but cheap and geekishly rewarding" "DanS" <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@a.d.e.l.p.h.i.a.n.e.t> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:Xns987C80B7192ACthisnthatadelphianet@216.196. 97.142...
>
> So it's a combo DSL modem/IP Phone/Wireless Router/IP TV box ?
>
> That's just stupid. Just another instance in which you can see you are
> better off with individual components, if this indeed as I describe it.
it's hard to explain if you don't know the peculiar situation where I live.
besides, the tv part will just be temporary, it's a limited free offer for
some months but we'll recede when it expires. and, trust me, the choice of
the ISP was long considered and we're sure it was the best we could have.
anyway, my only question was, which of the three possible solutions I listed
do you guys think is the best? I mean, imagine you didn't have any other
choice besides those three. really, if somebody put a gun to your head and
said "go ahead, a, b or c", and he promised to spare your life only if the
connectivity issue was solved through your decision, what would you choose?
Swann |