John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 00:02:19 +0100, hlexa@hotmail.com (Axel
> Hammerschmidt) wrote in <1hovbla.4zuktk10nztvkN%hlexa@hotmail.com>:
>
> >John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 22:38:23 +0100, hlexa@hotmail.com (Axel
> >> Hammerschmidt) wrote in <1hov6zm.e6hqn5odi4owN%hlexa@hotmail.com>:
>
> >> >So two stations, one connected directly to the router and the other
> >> >using the repeater, each achieve 13.5 Mbps.

<snip>

> Depends what you meant by "connected directly to the router", which
> I took to be a _wired_ connection. With a single repeater:
>
> * Wireless G to wired network speed is a maximum of 27 Mbps.
>
> * Wireless G to wireless G network speed is a maximum of 13.5 Mbps.

"two stations"

<snip>

> >Why not use 802.11 no men cla ture?
>
> What nomenclature?

QED