On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 17:30:07 +0100, hlexa@hotmail.com (Axel
Hammerschmidt) wrote in <1howoea.1gqe1l41egfvhwN%hlexa@hotmail.com>:

>John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 00:02:19 +0100, hlexa@hotmail.com (Axel
>> Hammerschmidt) wrote in <1hovbla.4zuktk10nztvkN%hlexa@hotmail.com>:
>>
>> >John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 22:38:23 +0100, hlexa@hotmail.com (Axel
>> >> Hammerschmidt) wrote in <1hov6zm.e6hqn5odi4owN%hlexa@hotmail.com>:
>>
>> >> >So two stations, one connected directly to the router and the other
>> >> >using the repeater, each achieve 13.5 Mbps.
>
><snip>
>
>> Depends what you meant by "connected directly to the router", which
>> I took to be a _wired_ connection. With a single repeater:
>>
>> * Wireless G to wired network speed is a maximum of 27 Mbps.
>>
>> * Wireless G to wireless G network speed is a maximum of 13.5 Mbps.
>
>"two stations"
>
><snip>
>
>> >Why not use 802.11 no men cla ture?
>>
>> What nomenclature?
>
>QED

Ahhh... hairsplitting. Sorry, I thought you had a meaningful comment.
My mistake.

--
Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://Wireless.wikia.com>
John Navas FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi>
Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo>
Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>