View Single Post
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 11-16-2006, 04:36 PM
John Navas
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: extending range: torn between "expensive but supposedly safe" and "risky, but cheap and geekishly rewarding"

On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 16:52:42 +0100, "Swann" <swann@tempsperdu.fr> wrote
in <eji1gd$it1$1@registered.motzarella.org>:

>"John Navas" <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
>news:6ihml2hoquqp164t0a9805eblgm79ive0m@4ax.com.. .
>>
>> Instead of a simple repeater you can use a wireless Ethernet bridge
>> (that can support enough clients) cabled to a wireless access point on a
>> different non-overlapping channel; i.e.,

>
>this would imply buying a bridge and an ap... I'm trying to keep this as
>cheap as possible. I ain't looking for the most professional or elegant
>solution, I just would like to have my house fully covered with the least
>expense...


Fast, cheap, reliable. Pick at most two.

--
Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://Wireless.wikia.com>
John Navas FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi>
Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo>
Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>

Reply With Quote