On 16 Nov 2006 12:09:23 -0800, miso@sushi.com wrote in
<1163707763.229249.127840@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups. com>:

>John Navas wrote:
>> <http://www.netaffilia.com/ad/electronics/frys/i/2006/11/15/20809.html>
>
>I own one. It sucks. Of course, mine could be defective, but I doubt
>it. The "wrong" biquad works much better. The Airlink Omni worked about
>as well as the antenna built in my SMC card.

Much depends on what you are trying to accomplish. If all that's needed
is gain, then the Airlink may be a decent and cost-effective solution.
But if part of your problem is interference, then an omni probably won't
help, because it tends to amplify interference along with the desired
signal. By comparison, a directional antenna will tend to reject
interference that's not in line with the desired signal. That's
probably why your biquad, a directional antenna, worked better for you
than the omni. If so, *any* omni would probably be the same.

--
Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://Wireless.wikia.com>
John Navas FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi>
Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo>
Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>