Sebastian Gottschalk wrote:
> And again you're ignoring where the real cost benefit comes from: Because
> those old processors are so cheap and mass-produced. The 0.5$ on certifying
> a new, faster processor are peanuts in comparison to production costs.

So you have no problem spending $0.5 million to have each part 'fully
qualified' for a couple of satellites? Do you have any idea how many
semiconductors parts are in a satellite? The math says your post is
nothing but complete denial. What is your point?