View Single Post
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-2006, 05:49 PM
John Navas
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Any new Treos coming to Cingular?

On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 17:14:29 +0000 (UTC), dold@XReXXAnyXn.usenet.us.com
wrote in <ejkqll$dac$3@blue.rahul.net>:

>John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>> Tested it, and "215 Peachtree St NE, Atlanta, GA 30303" was the #1
>> result. SW was the #2 result. (Others were fuzzy matches.) Doesn't
>> seem a problem to me.

>
>Convenient, that, presuming that was really the one you wanted, or maybe
>you preselected an address that worked well for this test.


That was a randomly chosen address on your worst case street. What more
must I do?

>Sometimes it
>doesn't work so well.


Examples?

>The GPS generally has a good first chance position.


Once it has gotten a clear view of the sky and acquired satellites,
which typically takes minutes from a cold start. Then there's the issue
of keying in and finding the destination address, a real pain on my
Magellan handheld. Not to mention no local search or contacts.

GMM on my V551 is way faster, usable, and convenient, for me at least.
"To each his own."

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

Reply With Quote