Oh yeah?
You get no say to tell him he gets no say whatsoever on what is
'wrong'.
So there.


Path: newssvr12.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm05.news.prodigy. com!newsdst01.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.com!newscon 04.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!newshub.sdsu.edu!b order1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!new sfeed.iinet.net.au!newsfeed.iinet.net.au!per-qv1-newsstorage1.iinet.net.au!per-qv1-newsstorage1.iinet.net.au!per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au!not-for-mail
From: "Fred" <fred fred.com>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt,alt.comp.hardware,alt. comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt
References: <woj7h.18664$fh.3281 tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com> <ejklpg$kvd$1 aioe.server.aioe.org> <S%m7h.18676$fh.17515 tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com> <455E2CB8.CFCF077E yahoo.com> <455e5f1c$0$28179$5a62ac22 per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au> <455E6BFA.EDCF0420 yahoo.com> <_sD7h.18717$fh.2870 tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com> <455F09F1.84B0AD90 yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: New Computer Build
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 07:45:45 +1100
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <455f70fc$0$28220$5a62ac22 per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.206.255.32
X-Trace: 1163882749 per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au 28220 203.206.255.32
Xref: prodigy.net alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt:225822 alt.comp.hardware:323645 alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:479157

You get no say what so ever on what is 'wrong'


CBFalconer <cbfalconer yahoo.com> wrote:
> Jack Bruss wrote:
>> "CBFalconer" <cbfalconer yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> Fred wrote:
>>>> CBFalconer <cbfalconer yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>> Jack Bruss wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We're looking for a low cost system - I'm thinking around $300 -
>>>>>> $400.
>>>>>
>>>>> top-posted, thus ignored.
>>>>
>>>> Unlikely he actually gives a flying red fuck what you ignore.
>>>
>>> That's entirely up to him. However he may now have some idea that
>>> he is contravening normal usenet usage.
>>
>> Is this better?
>
> Much. Thanks for co-operating. Bottom posting is NEVER wrong.