Larc <larc-news@jupiterlink.net> wrote
> kony <spam@spam.com> wrote

>> If the board runs stable with the other memory at certain
>> timings, but can't run stabiliy with that memory at same
>> timings, and those timings are what the Kingston was
>> spec'd to use, it implicates the memory.

> Bingo!

Nope, its just not believable that Kingston is actually shipping
some ram that 11 out of 12 bad in all systems its used in.

No one's quality control is THAT bad.

It'll work fine in some other chipsets/bios so aint actually BAD at all.