Thus spaketh Ivor Jones:
> "Stefan Kaniuk" <s.kaniuk@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
> news:%rKFe.3514$hc4.1751@newsfe6-win.ntli.net...
>>
>
> Secondly, they are not *my* rules and it is not me personally telling
> you what you can or cannot do, it is *common sense* and *respect for
> other people*. This group, as with all others in the uk. hierarchy
> are created to specific rules laid down and one of them is that if
> the group charter specifies no advertising then that is what should
> be respected.
> Also Stefan you should be aware that consistent abuse can and will be
> reported to the poster's ISP. They have been known to revoke an
> account in extreme circumstances, so you may want to rethink your
> attitude. The
> "it's-the-internet-and-I-can-do-as-I-like-and-you-can't-stop-me"
> attitude is childish and serves only to confirm other people's
> attitudes towards you and your actions.
> It may well be the internet but you *cannot* do exactly as you please
> in all circumstances, there *are* rules that you should abide by and
> only someone with no regard for others would disregard them.
>

I don't believe there has been any advertising.

If you don't mention a VoIP provider how can one discuss the matter, or is it
the fact only Sipgate can be mentioned?

There was a question of where the 1 minute cut off was stated, and I posted
the reference.

http://www.voipcheap.co.uk is a new service, if it wasn't posted I wouldn't
have known about it until I finally received the email.

How did others hear about Sipgate or Vonage, if people hadn't posted their
details on newsgroups.

I just can not see how what was posted could be classed as advertising.