kony <spam@spam.com> wrote in news:3o1fm2d34dcs5nuvcvovhdscup57mvd9no@
4ax.com:

> Now steering back to the original thread topic. OP wants a
> mouse with longest battery life. Traditional NiMH will not
> give that result. An optimally low-power mouse combined
> with either alkaline, lithium, or the newest breed of
> slow-self-discharge NiMH (which are lower capacity and so
> significantly shorter runtime than alkaline or lithium but
> cheaper over several years) is the correct solution. Buying
> highest rated mAH NiMH is a drastic reduction in runtime for
> the OP's expressed purpose.

I really think the OP just wants to not have to keep changing batteries
and for that the solution is rechargeables. Yes, the OP said:

> I know that rechargeable batteries are an option, but would prefer to
> keep using regular Duracell's, but with longer life.

I suspect that he/she simply means that getting some NiMH batteries and a
battery charger isn't desirable because it still involves the
inconvenience of the batteries running down and needing to be changed and
charged. A mouse with a charging stand solves that problem. The NiMH
batteries will far outlast the alkalines and the OP will do a lot less
buying batteries and throwing them away.

--
ybbxvatyvxrnobeantnvayvivatyvxrnurergvpyvfgravatgb neguheyrrerpbeqfznxv
atnyylbhesevraqfsrryfbthvyglnobhggurveplavpvfznaqg urerfgbsgurvetrareng
vbaabgriragurtbireazragnertbaanfgbclbhabjohgnerlbh ernqlgborurnegoebxra