kony wrote:

>>>It's doubtful those cells actually achieve upwards of
>>>3000mAH. Even the majors are only now achieving 2700mAH,
>>
>>http://www.thomasdistributing.com/ac...-batteries.htm
>>
>>You will probably say they are not a major. So be it. And who mentioned
>>"upwards of 3000mAh" ??
>
> You did.

Liar. I said "soon to be 3000mAh."

Message-ID: <3gb9h.2565$3b4.1907@newsfe15.phx>

Please quote back where I said "upwards of 3000mAh" or admit you
are a liar.

> They aren't a major. Their actual capacity is no better
> than Sanyo ~ 2600 (between 2500-2700), plus they're
> overpriced. IOW, no reason at all to use them.

You're full of hot air, again. I've got four of them, and they all
test at over 2900 mAh. They've been making rechargeable batteries
for a long time. And they cost about the same as the 2500mAh or 2700mAh
Sanyo batteries. You're just making stuff up now.

>>Standard Energizer alkaline AA batteries are
>>only 2850 mAh.
>
> You are still ignoring that this thread is within the
> context of a "wireless mouse with longest battery life", and
> in that context, standard Energizer alkalines will easily
> last 200% as long, probably even longer than those
> Accupowers.

Maybe yes, maybe no, depending on how much the mouse is used.

>>The contrary is true. NiMH bateries require several charge/discharge
>>cycles to achieve maximum capacity. And chargers from Maha and
>>LaCrosse can give old batteries full capacity.
>
> That's a great way to senselessly waste time and battery
> life. Charge the battery, use it, recharge it. Using a
> charger to drain them first just wears them more. Only when
> brand new and having a need for first-use longest life
> possible would it matter much, which is not typically the
> case with mice.

Which has nothing to do with your comment that the mAh rating
is only valid when the NiMH battery is new. But then again, you
made so many erroneous statements in this thread that I can
understand your attempts to steer away from them.