On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 19:59:38 +0000 (UTC), arnstein@panix.com (David
Arnstein) wrote in <ekkora$e7s$1@reader2.panix.com>:

>In article <f19rm29u3tqvkin3j3solha706b2s4g3m0@4ax.com>,
>John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:

>>Why not keep the Cisco, and just use the WHR-HP-G54 as a wireless access
>>point?

>I have problems with clutter and appearance. That is why I was pining
>away for a one box solution. Two boxes (cable modem + wireless router)
>is already a compromise for me. Three boxes would be really bad. I
>would prefer to staple RJ45 cables to baseboards and forego wireless.

I respect your priorities, but my own priorities would be different,
because the Cisco 800 is a much better router than anything at the low
end of the wireless market. To me it seems like replacing a quality
Canon DSLR with a mediocre Sigma DSLR just to match the brand of
mediocre Sigma lenses.

--
Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://Wireless.wikia.com>
John Navas FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi>
Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo>
Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>