View Single Post
  #72 (permalink)  
Old 12-02-2006, 08:32 PM
nash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Bicyclist killed by woman driver who was downloading cell phone ring tones

Robert I was trying to disagree with Dave, maybe the timing was mixed up.
I understand your comment and thought it was hilarious.
Cheers

"Robert Coe" <bob@1776.COM> wrote in message
news:22n3n2hulp9o7dt8shbqk52496vgvpbct5@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 02 Dec 2006 19:54:29 GMT, "nash" <zwepytzkehillc9@jetable.net>
> wrote:
> : Because you know I am right.
> : Again you expect me to dig up stuff I saw on TV maybe 10 years ago. I
> give
> : up. Roughly what I said is true.
> : Per city I only rationalized. 100/ day easy.
> : Plus I was only answering to Dave's Reckoning. The jist of what I was
> : saying or the idea, reaction, does not have to be footnoted.
> : I disagreed, you disagree with me, therefore you agree with Dave.
>
> I do? How did that happen? Just yesterday I posted the following:
>
> -> On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 20:55:40 -0500, "Dave Reckoning"
> -> <Dave_Reckoning@notmail.com> wrote:
> -> : The best idea I have seen is counter-intuitive, take down all of the
> -> : traffic signs and street marking and make people rely on common
> sense!!!
> -> : Street markings and bike lanes just give the cars the false sense
> that
> -> : they can drive over anything that gets in their way.
> -> :
> -> If that's the best idea you've seen, you should find a better
> optometrist.
>
> : Tell us why you agree with dave's reckoning. We are waiting patiently
> for
> : a well thought out, footnoted, master's thesis on this.
>
> I guess you're in for a long wait.
>
> : "Robert Coe" <bob@1776.COM> wrote in message
> : news:ccl3n2ltmpme5cae6pk495nshg617g6g8o@4ax.com...
> : >: >>Sure Dave and that is why any Chinese city has 100's of cyclist
> head
> : > : >>injuries everyday of the year. Do not citation me I know it as
> common
> : > : >>knowledge. Anyone?
> : > : >>
> : > : >
> : > : > a) you must be new here - claiming such a patently ridiculous
> : > : > statistic to be true without any proof is only employed by trolls
> and
> : > : > pro-helmet zealots; and
> : > : >
> : > : > b) "common knowledge" isn't either.
> : > :
> : > : here is another from J. Hopkins U.
> : > : http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/art...?artid=1380951
> : > :
> : > : I could go on.
> : >
> : > We'll forgive you if you don't.




Reply With Quote