WHAT THE FUCK?? What electronic manufacturing sting did you have? The
only sting you had is banging Mij.

In article <icebn25ieaa0amojfmdjovvkib02bhpq2t@4ax.com>,
John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 00:44:55 -0800, SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com>
> wrote in <45753185$0$82594$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>:
>
> >Dave wrote:
> >> Yes, but even $1 per phone adds up. Now you know why they did it. Just
> >> donb't buy a Motorola phone.
> >
> >They didn't save $1 per phone, he made that number up, as well as
> >admitting that he has no idea how much they saved, if anything.
>
> That's actually based on experience in electronic manufacturing.
>
> >In reality, Motorola chose to ship a charger with a smaller physical
> >size. Most people charge their phones overnight, and the 375mA rate of
> >charge is fine, and lengthens battery life. With cellular, people like
> >small, even when there are trade-offs.
>
> In fact quite a few people have been unhappy about the lackluster
> performance of Motorola chargers. The difference in size is too small
> to matter (and could easily be reduced to zero), and the low charging
> rate actually serves to decrease battery life, especially through
> insufficient/partial charging.
>
> >Not buying a Motorola phone may be acceptable for GSM, but for CDMA,
> >there are some very good reasons to select Motorola over other brands.
>
> In fact Motorola makes some very good and very successful CDMA phones;
> e.g., V325i, RAZR V3m, KRZR K1m.