paulgq@providencedata.com wrote:
>
> shit results? get your facts straight and adjust your poor attitude.
>
> The system doesn't just spit out the closest match, your specific
> model is not listed in their database and is not supported by them
> at all. It seems this has been your mistake all along.
>
.... snip ...

Please do not top-post. Your answer should follow (or be
intermixed with) the material to which you reply, after snipping
anything not germane to that reply. See the following links.

--
Some informative links:
<http://www.geocities.com/nnqweb/>
<http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html>
<http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html>
<http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html>
<http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/>