Jud Hardcastle wrote:
> In article <jackzwick-2ECFEC.17584329122006@news.dallas.sbcglobal.net>,
> jackzwick@yahoo.com says...
>> as part of that they say the Cingular name will go away,
>> to be replaced by AT&T
>>
> Not that my humble opinion is worth anything but I think changing (back)
> to AT&T is *stupid* (but then IMO so is not offering TDMA or GAIT with
> so much of the country still not GSM but that's another story). Couldn't
> they use "AT&T Cingular" or something?

Industry trade journals say the global name recognition of AT&T is worth
the change.