On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 21:19:54 -0500, Robert Coe <bob@1776.COM> wrote:

>On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 17:03:13 -0600, karlkrandall@sbcglobal.net wrote:
>: On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:19:23 -0600, decaturtxcowboy
>: <nope_none_@nowayspam.com> wrote:
>:
>: >Industry trade journals say the global name recognition of AT&T is worth
>: >the change.
>:
>:
>: 99% of Cingular's business is stateside.
>
>"Cingular" was a sappy name from the beginning. But amongst those of a certain
>age, the name "AT&T" conjures up dark memories of the hated "Ma Bell". It's as
>though George W. Bush tried to refurbish his reputation by calling himself
>"Richard Milhous Cheney".
>
>Anyway, the natural progression from "Cingular", now that they've swallowed
>another company, would be "Doubular".
>
>Bob



How about DroppedCallular