On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 03:00:46 -0800, floyd@apaflo.com (Floyd
L. Davidson) wrote:


>The point is that you don't understand how it works, and that
>is why you can't see the point in what I've discussed.
>

Ah but I do!
Your ramblings about volumes of water and temp rises are not
particularly high-tech nor news per se, but you still fail
to grasp the basic fact that in a system where the majority
of the heat removal is through the radiator, and where the
temp change in the CPU and other parts is a significantly
larger range than in the water, measuring the water for
system control is necessarily less precise. Further you
completely ignore the fact that multiple methods of failure
will result in the cooled-component overheating while the
water temp (sensor measurement of this parameter) DROPS.



>Go back to your overclocking system, and be very hopeful the
>hose doesn't break...


You still don't get it. I described optimal low noise for
any system, not some extreme overclocking.