In article <nl8ph.21069$GD4.10340@newsfe13.phx>,
"Mij Adyaw" <mij@SpamBucket.com> wrote:

> <karlkrandall@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:15r9q2da2plr8l2eps1sb7gdsn1agdqmrd@4ax.com...
> > On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:17:18 -0600, Tim McNamara
> > <timmcn@bitstream.net> wrote:
> >
> >>In article <st%oh.42980$9S6.41842@newsfe15.phx>,
> >> "Mij Adyaw" <mij@SpamBucket.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Apple may have made a serious mistake in not offering the phone
> >>> on America's Most Reliable Network. It is interesting that they
> >>> chose GSM rather than the technically superior CDMA.
> >>
> >>Possibly. Or perhaps the Most Reliable Network made a mistake in
> >>not partnering with Apple.
> >>
> >>But Cingular? The lowest-rated cell phone provider in America?
> >>That's gonna stop me from getting one unless Cingular improves
> >>dramatically.
> >
> > First of all, its low rating is in Customer Service, not Network
> > capability, secondly Sprint always comes in worse, whther its J.D.
> > Power, the Yankee Group, or Consumer Reports.
> >
> > Pick a year 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003;
> >
> > the results are the same. Sprint is worst.
>
> Yes, however if you have actually tried both Sprint and Cingular, you
> will find that Sprint is much better especially with there excellent
> roaming capability. The only thing that Sprint lacks in customer
> service.

I've had Sprint for quite a few years, basically since they got into the
business. I've had generally good technical service and good customer
service as well.