On 18 Jul 2005 08:07:50 -0700, "msim" <msim2020@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>Cool. That explains some. So 166 is not a problem.
>
>I am guessing that the PC3200 i.e. 400Mhz can also cruise at 333 i.e.
>166 MHz. Is that not confusing!

It's only confusing because you keep using the wrong terms!

It's not "400MHz". I will grant you that there may be
someone, somewhere, also using the wrong terms- making it
confusing, but that doesn't mean that _you_ have to use the
wrong terms too.

It's 200MHz, PC3200, DDR400 if you must use double data rate
terms.