On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 02:01:02 -0800, floyd@apaflo.com (Floyd
L. Davidson) wrote:


>If you could read, it sure would make your articles more
>accurate. Go back and *read* what I said instead of jumping to
>stupid conclusions that don't match reality. (As I noted
>previously, stormrider changed the subject header, and kony was
>the one who continued the previous discussion.)
>

If you could read, you'd have noted that I _ONLY_ replied
after, to details you had already posted in the very same
thread, specifically:

"If there are components that will fry with no flow,
then a flow meter of some kind that will positively
indicate that flow is below a certain amount, and a
mechanism to shutdown the system, are essential for
unattended operation.


At which point the subtopic introduced by _you_ was
continued, by you.


>>You will note that custom air ducts and double sound padding is
>>not "fan speed control" and if you were as much of an 'expert'
>
>Of course, "custom air ducts and double sound padding" don't do
>a whole lot of good if the fan speed isn't controlled too.

Actually they Do, do a lot of good. They do significantly
lower escaped noise levels still, but alone are usually not
enough to result in a silent system. That doesn't mean
they're not doing a lot of good though, since they are still
one of several possible and effective measures for noise
reduction. In some cases/components a user cannot simply
turn off fans nor throttle them back to very low RPM. It is
a good target but one approached, not assumed.


>
>David you aren't getting anywhere with all of this blubbering
>about being shown up as a fool. Go read the entire discussion,
>learn something, and either be quiet or be polite.

I politely suggest that you don't even have a quiet AND
reliable system yourself, as you have so far not demonstated
the ability to implement it beyond any kind of
alpha-experimental stage. The phrase couch-chair
quarterback comes to mind.