Floyd L. Davidson wrote:
> David Maynard <nospam@private.net> wrote:
>
>>Floyd L. Davidson wrote:
>>
>>>>News flash: when someone who was never in your previous
>>>>discussion posts a new and different thread of their own with a
>>>>new and different topic they are not 'continuing' your
>>>>discussion and it is the height of irrational arrogance for you
>>>>to claim so.
>>>
>>>However, someone who was, *did*;
>>
>>No, 'someone' didn't. The thread was started by Stormrider and
>>he wasn't in the thread you've said was 'the previous.'
>
>
> If you could read, it sure would make your articles more
> accurate.

Making stupid accusations is useless gibberish so why do you bother?

> Go back and *read* what I said instead of jumping to
> stupid conclusions that don't match reality.

Why don't YOU try reading what you write for a change?

I said someone who wasn't in your earlier discussion started this thread
and you replied "However, someone who was, *did*." That's utter nonsense.

> (As I noted
> previously, stormrider changed the subject header,

Stormrider didn't 'change' a damn thing. He started a thread titled "a
silent air cooled computer project".... period.

> and kony was
> the one who continued the previous discussion.)

And even if true you think that proves what?


>>However, Stormrider's last message included "The more I think
>>about it the less I like the idea of leaks and the potential
>>maintanence headaches of water cooling, so it will most likely
>>be air cooled.
>
> And who besides him ever mentioned that concept!

Which is irrelevant to the point of the thread not being solely about "fan
speed control" as you falsely claimed. And it's especially obvious since
he's the one who STARTED the thread and defined the topic.


>>I am playing with the idea of custom air ducts and double sound padding.
>>And thanks to Floyd the fans will be software controlled this time."
>>
>>You will note that custom air ducts and double sound padding is
>>not "fan speed control" and if you were as much of an 'expert'
>
>
> Of course, "custom air ducts and double sound padding" don't do
> a whole lot of good if the fan speed isn't controlled too.

Nonsense.


> David you aren't getting anywhere with all of this blubbering
> about being shown up as a fool. Go read the entire discussion,
> learn something, and either be quiet or be polite.

More humor from the fellah who claimed the title "a silent air cooled
computer project" 'proves' that water temp monitoring is required.


>>as you claim you'd know there are other methods and means to
>>making a 'silent' PC, depending on what one means by 'silent'
>>and what tradeoffs they're willing to make. Which is why "a
>>silent air cooled computer project" and "fan control" are not
>>synonyms, much less "water" and "air."
>
>
> The only one who has tried to pretend any such thing is you.
>

I don't 'pretend'. I simply reply to the nonsense you post.