kony wrote:

> On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 02:01:02 -0800, floyd@apaflo.com (Floyd
> L. Davidson) wrote:
>
>
>
>>If you could read, it sure would make your articles more
>>accurate. Go back and *read* what I said instead of jumping to
>>stupid conclusions that don't match reality. (As I noted
>>previously, stormrider changed the subject header, and kony was
>>the one who continued the previous discussion.)
>>
>
>
> If you could read, you'd have noted that I _ONLY_ replied
> after, to details you had already posted in the very same
> thread, specifically:
>
> "If there are components that will fry with no flow,
> then a flow meter of some kind that will positively
> indicate that flow is below a certain amount, and a
> mechanism to shutdown the system, are essential for
> unattended operation.

Yep, that's the one that started it here, in reply to Stormrider's concern
"What do you think about the pump stopping, though. First it will fry the
components" when Alceryes suggested water cooling.

That's also the topic which Flyod argued "Nobody has claimed that it has
*anything* to do with "system failure" and that "The topic has been how to
silence *fans*."


> At which point the subtopic introduced by _you_ was
> continued, by you.
>
>
>
>>>You will note that custom air ducts and double sound padding is
>>>not "fan speed control" and if you were as much of an 'expert'
>>
>>Of course, "custom air ducts and double sound padding" don't do
>>a whole lot of good if the fan speed isn't controlled too.
>
>
> Actually they Do, do a lot of good. They do significantly
> lower escaped noise levels still, but alone are usually not
> enough to result in a silent system. That doesn't mean
> they're not doing a lot of good though, since they are still
> one of several possible and effective measures for noise
> reduction. In some cases/components a user cannot simply
> turn off fans nor throttle them back to very low RPM. It is
> a good target but one approached, not assumed.
>
>
>
>>David you aren't getting anywhere with all of this blubbering
>>about being shown up as a fool. Go read the entire discussion,
>>learn something, and either be quiet or be polite.
>
>
> I politely suggest that you don't even have a quiet AND
> reliable system yourself, as you have so far not demonstated
> the ability to implement it beyond any kind of
> alpha-experimental stage. The phrase couch-chair
> quarterback comes to mind.