On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 08:40:22 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:


>AND I have proven that its just plain pig ignorant drivel with
>the last ram upgrade. The system uses the swap file MUCH
>less it did with the smaller amount of physical ram, as it should.


Yes, you concede "MUCH less" is a good thing, but then
stumble on the concept that NONE is even better - if there
were enough physical memory to allow it.




>> If you choose to run without a swapfile, then there would be no performance drop - simple as that.
>
>Wrong, as always. Its nothing like as simple as that and
>completely trivial to prove that its nothing like as simple as that.

Ok, please devote all your posting to that trivial proof.


>
>Even kony has never actually been stupid
>enough to claim its as simple as that either.

Apparently you don't find it simple. What can we say?