GT <ContactGT_remove_@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> [Rod] AND I have proven that its just plain pig ignorant drivel with the last ram upgrade. The
>> system uses the swap file MUCH
>> less it did with the smaller amount of physical ram, as it should.

> [GT] So you have finally taken on board the fact that windows does
> use the swapfile when there is still sufficient free RAM. Good.

>>> [GT] If something that has been swapped out is
>>> then required it is reloaded from the swapfile,

>> [Rod] And that is just plain wrong too, and its completely trivial to
>> prove that that stupid pig ignorant claim is just plain wrong too.

> [GT] Given that you have told us your PC still pages out to swapfile,

I never ever said anything even remotely resembling anything
like that in the sense that swapfile use doesnt change.

> please explain to us all, in an adult sentence, how your special
> modified version of windows gets those paged-out pages back into RAM without hard disk access and
> a corresponding delay?

You aint even established that it does get anything back
from the swap file when you have enough physical ram
to be able to do without a swap file and have one anyway.

And its completely trivial to prove that it doesnt in fact do that with the test I spelt out.