On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:41:28 -0800, Jeff Liebermann
<jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us> wrote in
<vo54s2lcaa2d5rv50vr11ehcl9uo4ri2nj@4ax.com>:

>John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> hath wroth:
>
>>On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:56:11 -0800, Jeff Liebermann
>><jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us> wrote in
>><61i1s2d7uf5r4h1h71dvmd8h1ehcavbu2g@4ax.com>:
>>
>>>>More research on the internet found me at this site: http://
>>>>www.wirelessdesignmag.com/ShowPR.aspx?
>>>>PUBCODE=055&ACCT=0031546&ISSUE=0610&RELTYPE=PR &ORIGRELTYPE=FE&PRODCODE=W0240&PRODLETT=A
>>>>which shows a test setup of wireless nodes connected with 'RF cable'.
>>>
>>>In the future, please wrap your URL's with <> so that they don't wrap.
>>><http://www.wirelessdesignmag.com/ShowPR.aspx?CommonCount=0PUBCODE=055&ACCT=0031546& ISSUE=0610&RELTYPE=PR&ORIGRELTYPE=FE&PRODCODE=W024 0&PRODLETT=A>
>>
>>That's recommended practice, but _won't_ necessarily stop the unwanted
>>wrapping. It notably doesn't help in Forte Agent.
>
>Wrong.

No, just different versions.

> use Forte Agent 4.1/32.1088 for most of postings and have
>found that wrapping URL's in <> now prevents wrapping. Earlier
>versions just made a mess.

True. Which is what I meant. Agent lost its way IMnsHO with its change
in basic architecture after version 1.93, which I still use, turning a
lean mean fighting machine into sluggish bugware. (FYI, I dutifully
reported some of those bugs, but failed to generate any real interest in
fixing them.)

My original point remains: Wrapping URLs in <>, while a good standards
compliant idea in general, _won't_ necessarily eliminate bad wrapping.
That it works for you is great, but it won't work for lots of others,
including me.

--
Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://Wireless.wikia.com>
John Navas FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi>
Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo>
Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>