"kevinkeithweaver@sbcglobal.net" <kevinkeithweaver1@sbcglobal.net> wrote
in news:xnfzh.25841$yC5.23183@newssvr27.news.prodigy. net:



>>
>>
>>
> Wrong again. read about it in your bill. I'm not in a txt plan.


Which means that you probably don't text enough to incur any serious
damage.



> And
> after I went down there and asked the guys name for the court papers I
> got a call on my cell phone. "Were sorry" you can leave your plan.


I hear they are trying to purge all the whiners and morons.


> guess
> where I was at when this call came in ? Yep, The verizon store.


And I was in bed with Anna Nicole. See how easy it is to be someplace
you weren't?


"Waiting
> for the mgr that was busy" Told by the guy that asked me what it was
> concerning. The best part about this BS is that I'm told on the phone
> that I get 100 text's per month. I asked when was it added ? A few
> months ago. I then asked why did I get billed for 4 last month ? I'm
> then put on hold. A few mins later I'm told I'm allowed to end the
> contract without the fee.


Do the world a favor- take them up on the offer. The fact that they
made it gives you no legal recourse. Any 'damages' incurred going
forward of done voluntarily and not as a matter of contract law. If you
chose to stay, you chose to stay with the current pricing in place.


> They will do anything to keep you from getting
> out early. Even lie to your face.


Where did they lie? They offered to let you out of your contract. You
did pass Frshsman English, didn't you? Or is that next year when you
get to the big kids' school?

>
> Damages would have been the extra .05 per txt.


You're right- WOULD HAVE BEEN. By agreeing to stay in contract, you
agreed to the new pricing. Had they not offered to let you out of it,
things would be different.


> Do you even understand
> the word contract ?


Apparently we all understand it much better than you.



> I guess you don't. I don't take any crap from any
> company.


No- you whine and take up the compnay's time. You're the type of
customer that drives normal folks nuts- armed with very little
understanding of the law and absolutely no understanding of the issue at
hand. You spend hours trying to convince a company that you HAVE to be
right because your peanut-sized brain can't comprehend that anyone else
might actually know what they are talking about.


> It's people like you that do so, the more they find, the more
> they try to get away with it.
>
> Small claims court cost 31.00 to file. When they would have lost, As
> it's all spelled out on there enclosed paper in my bill. If you don't
> agree then you can leave without paying the fee. They would have to
> pay the court costs, along with my time and there lost time.

They won't have to pay for yout time- further proof that you don't have
a clue about what you are doing. Small Claims Court does not compensate
for time- only the "small claim" at hand.

Besides- McDonalds is paying what.....6 bucks an hour? I'm sure they
can get by without their fry guy for an hour or two.




> You think there
> going to show up for 175.00 ? I have all the time in the world. I
> would have enjoyed going to small claims court.

They might in fact send somebody from a local store who will be more
than happy to explain to the judge that the offer to get out of your
contract was made and that you refused. This would blow your case
apart. Of course, you'll have to admit to it yourself even if they
aren't there, unless you are simply just a bottom-feeder who's looking
for his payback from the Big Corporate Monster.

My bet- you don't mention it at all. You don't seem to have the moral
character or the balls to tell the truth to the judge.