Scott wrote:
> "kevinkeithweaver@sbcglobal.net" <kevinkeithweaver1@sbcglobal.net> wrote
> in news:xnfzh.25841$yC5.23183@newssvr27.news.prodigy. net:
>
>
>
>>>
>>>
>> Wrong again. read about it in your bill. I'm not in a txt plan.
>
>
> Which means that you probably don't text enough to incur any serious
> damage.
>
>
>
>> And
>> after I went down there and asked the guys name for the court papers I
>> got a call on my cell phone. "Were sorry" you can leave your plan.
>
>
> I hear they are trying to purge all the whiners and morons.
>
>
>> guess
>> where I was at when this call came in ? Yep, The verizon store.
>
>
> And I was in bed with Anna Nicole. See how easy it is to be someplace
> you weren't?
>
>
> "Waiting
>> for the mgr that was busy" Told by the guy that asked me what it was
>> concerning. The best part about this BS is that I'm told on the phone
>> that I get 100 text's per month. I asked when was it added ? A few
>> months ago. I then asked why did I get billed for 4 last month ? I'm
>> then put on hold. A few mins later I'm told I'm allowed to end the
>> contract without the fee.
>
>
> Do the world a favor- take them up on the offer. The fact that they
> made it gives you no legal recourse. Any 'damages' incurred going
> forward of done voluntarily and not as a matter of contract law. If you
> chose to stay, you chose to stay with the current pricing in place.
>
>
>> They will do anything to keep you from getting
>> out early. Even lie to your face.
>
>
> Where did they lie? They offered to let you out of your contract. You
> did pass Frshsman English, didn't you? Or is that next year when you
> get to the big kids' school?
>
>> Damages would have been the extra .05 per txt.
>
>
> You're right- WOULD HAVE BEEN. By agreeing to stay in contract, you
> agreed to the new pricing. Had they not offered to let you out of it,
> things would be different.
>
>
>> Do you even understand
>> the word contract ?
>
>
> Apparently we all understand it much better than you.
>
>
>
>> I guess you don't. I don't take any crap from any
>> company.
>
>
> No- you whine and take up the compnay's time. You're the type of
> customer that drives normal folks nuts- armed with very little
> understanding of the law and absolutely no understanding of the issue at
> hand. You spend hours trying to convince a company that you HAVE to be
> right because your peanut-sized brain can't comprehend that anyone else
> might actually know what they are talking about.
>
>
>> It's people like you that do so, the more they find, the more
>> they try to get away with it.
>>
>> Small claims court cost 31.00 to file. When they would have lost, As
>> it's all spelled out on there enclosed paper in my bill. If you don't
>> agree then you can leave without paying the fee. They would have to
>> pay the court costs, along with my time and there lost time.
>
> They won't have to pay for yout time- further proof that you don't have
> a clue about what you are doing. Small Claims Court does not compensate
> for time- only the "small claim" at hand.
>
> Besides- McDonalds is paying what.....6 bucks an hour? I'm sure they
> can get by without their fry guy for an hour or two.
>
>
>
>
>> You think there
>> going to show up for 175.00 ? I have all the time in the world. I
>> would have enjoyed going to small claims court.
>
> They might in fact send somebody from a local store who will be more
> than happy to explain to the judge that the offer to get out of your
> contract was made and that you refused. This would blow your case
> apart. Of course, you'll have to admit to it yourself even if they
> aren't there, unless you are simply just a bottom-feeder who's looking
> for his payback from the Big Corporate Monster.
>
> My bet- you don't mention it at all. You don't seem to have the moral
> character or the balls to tell the truth to the judge.
>
>
>
>
You just don't get it. Not until last night did they offer to allow me
to get out once this all went down. Being you work and **** verizon off,
I now fully understand your reply. It's the network.