In article <v8nvs2pj1bbhvnsm60p46baevp0amljbfg@4ax.com>,
John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:

> >It was huge sample size, and the results
> >are indisputable.
>
> On the contrary -- Consumer Reports suffers from a self-selected sample
> of a non-representative universe. It also suffers from serious
> screwups, like the recent car seat debacle. And it just rated McDonalds
> coffee as better than Starbucks -- LOL!
> <http://www.amonline.com/article/article.jsp?siteSection=1&id=18130>

don't you wish you hadn't made a fool of yourself again by posting
this?