On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 08:50:17 -0500, "Don Udel \(ETC\)"
<donudel@ellijay.com> wrote in <eqprap08gk@enews1.newsguy.com>:

>"John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in message > For the facts,
>see Verizon coverage maps at
>> <http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/CoverageLocatorController?requesttype=NEWREQUEST>
>
>Didn't you read the disclaimer on the site you posted? Viz:
>The maps that display within the Coverage Locator Tool are not a guarantee
>of coverage and contain areas with no service. The maps rendered show only
>approximations (based on our internal data) of where rates and coverage
>apply.

That actual coverage can be even worse than what's portrayed on the map
doesn't have any real bearing on basic points illustrated by the map:
* Almost no AMPS-only coverage in the San Francisco Bay Area
* No AMPS-only coverage where Steven claims it exists
* Large coverage holes in areas where Steven claims coverage.

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>