John Navas wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 20:50:42 -0700, Notan <notan@ddressthatcanbespammed>
> wrote in <S8idnQDxVe2OeVLYnZ2dnUVZ_oninZ2d@giganews.com>:
>
>> John Navas wrote:
>
>>> On the contrary -- Consumer Reports suffers from a self-selected sample
>>> of a non-representative universe. It also suffers from serious
>>> screwups, like the recent car seat debacle. And it just rated McDonalds
>>> coffee as better than Starbucks -- LOL!
>>> <http://www.amonline.com/article/article.jsp?siteSection=1&id=18130>
>> Have you ever tasted Starbuck's coffee?
>>
>> It *does* taste burnt!
>
> Some does; some doesn't -- depends on the varietal or blend. But it's
> all better than McDonalds coffee as actually served at the average
> franchise. Or haven't you actually tasted McDonalds coffee?

"But it's all better" is purely objective.

You'd be more accurate with an "in my opinion" preface.

And, yes, I've tasted McDonald's. Not bad!

Also, IN MY OPINION, 7-11 makes a great cup of coffee.

--
Notan