On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 03:02:18 +0000, Chris Morrison
<hidden@nospam.priv> wrote:

>Unfortunately you have completely misunderstood the situation, albeit due to some significant
>details being left out by myself.
>
>First, there is no question of her refusing to pay, she has written to 3 (I prepared the letter) and
>stated that she is more than happy to pay for the services that she has actually received and used,
>she has also stated that she will pay for the handset provided under the contract. although we know
>that it was fully paid for during the first six months of the contract.
>
>*She is NOT refusing to pay her bill or for the services she has used, I don't know how that
>conclusion was reached.*

What did the contract she signed require her to pay? It would have
stated that she was to pay £x per month for 18 months. Whether or not
the phone was paid for after 6 months is immaterial.

It's not a question of refusing to pay for services recieved - it's a
question of meeting all of the terms of the contract she signed
--
Cheers

Peter

Please remove the invalid to reply