View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2007, 07:22 PM
miso@sushi.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: yet another biquad

On Feb 21, 10:44 am, "Chuck Olson"
<chuckolso...@REMOVETHIScomcast.net> wrote:
> "Chuck Olson" <chuckolso...@REMOVETHIScomcast.net> wrote in message
>
> news:-fednRoC-Kq6H0HYnZ2dnUVZ_qarnZ2d@comcast.com...
>
>
>
> > <m...@sushi.com> wrote in message
> >news:1172049235.344422.20780@s48g2000cws.googlegr oups.com...
> > >http://www.lazygranch.com/images/wifi/wifi_bq_1.jpg
> > >http://www.lazygranch.com/images/wifi/wifi_bq_2.jpg

>
> > > Yeah yeah, there are specs of solder on it and I didn't remove the
> > > stray flux. Whatever.

>
> > > I used a n to n adapter with one of the fittings hacksawed off. The
> > > loop is the standard circumference, but in a circle rather than a
> > > square to make life easier.

>
> > How about a link to the design formula?

>
> Oops - - I should have done the Google search first - -http://www.wikarekare.org/Antenna/bicircle.htmlseems to be the reference
> everyone is using.


Actually, I never saw that bicircle page. I just used circles based on
a post from Jeff Lieberman. I followed the Martysbug website as close
as possible except I used loops instead of squares. The wire length is
the same. Note the two wire feed used on that bicircle page is
considered to be the wrong way to do the feed. My feed is coaxial.
Instead of the pipe and coax shoving, I just hacked up a N to N
adapter.

http://martybugs.net/wireless/biquad/


Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links