e-teori <lyngbytest_nospam_@_nospam_business.tele.dk> hath wroth:
>Den Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:48:08 -0800. skrev Jeff Liebermann:
>
>> Donald G. Davis <dgdavis@blackhole.nyx.net> hath wroth:
>>
>>> I was given an old Dell Latitude CP laptop with 160 Mhz processor,
>>>running Win98SE. I would like to set this up to access the Internet from
>
><SNIP>
>
>> It's a 166 or 233 MHz processor.
>>
>> Basically true. I have a P133 Compaq something laptop that works just
>> fine with a few PCMCIA wireless cards (Orinico Silver) but is a total
>> loss with USB devices. The difference is that with older PCMCIA, much
>> of the protocol processing is done in hardware on the card, while it's
>> done in software (i.e. in the driver) with USB. Just compare the size
>> of the respective drivers.
>>
>> The DLink Cardbus adapter might be an oddity. It's difficult to tell
>> because you didn't bother supplying the model numbers (or the exact
>> laptop model). DLink has several models with radically different
>> chipsets inside but similar sounding model numbers. The older 16 bit
>> ones did much of the processing on the card and should work. The
>> newer ones are similar to USB and do it all in the driver. I'm rather
>> amazed that you were able to insert a 32bit PC Card/cardbus device
>> into a laptop that only has a 16bit PCMCIA slot.
>It's not often that one gets the chance to correct you, Jeff, so I'll
>pounce on the occasion here ;)
Oh, it's easy enough to catch my errors. It happens all too often
when I'm lazy or in a rush. Also when I don't bother to check all the
details or rely on my rapidly failing memory. I may have a Dell CPi
233MHz in the pile somewhere. It died long ago thanks to a fried
motherboard. I could swear that a 32 bit card did't fit, but I'm
apparently wrong. I'll double check if I find it.
>The Dell Latitude CP series of Laptops has got 2 CardBus slot, and not
>PCMCIA slots. AFAIR they were the first line of Dell laptops that got
>CardBus. Link to the specs :
>http://support.dell.com/support/edoc...ojav/specs.htm
I stand corrected. (I just hate it when that happens).
>They are quite good machines, and runs Linux quite well as long as you got
>the max 128 Mb ram they can take. XP runs on them as well, but don't
>expect a speeddeamon.
I've run XP on machines with 128MBytes just to see what happens. It
was a painful experience which I don't want to repeat.
>I've used the 233 Mhz versions with a Atheros 5213 based PCCard without
>any problems, under both OS's. Actually the first 60.000+ networks I
>collected during my wardrives, were collected by that laptop. Later on, I
>converted one of them into a digital pictureframe, and another one has
>been made into a selfcontained Wardriveing blackbox, and was installed
>into a taxicab for a month (netted me 30K+ new networks for my Wigle
>stats, which is quite good over here in Copenhagen).
Impressive collection of AP's. I wish I had the time. One of "my
never have time to finish" projects is a 2.4GHz direction finder. It
should be an interesting addition to the war driving arsenal.
The AR5213 seems to be one of the chips where most of the processing
was moved back into hardware. Kinda hard to tell for sure from the
description.
<http://www.atheros.com/pt/AR5004GBulletin.htm>
"A single driver and firmware code base supports all Atheros
chipsets, and provides both backward and forward compatibility
with Atheros previous and next-generation multi-standard designs."
If that's true, then there's not much the driver has to do as all the
hard stuff is done on the chip. That also makes it suitable for
underpowered CPU's. Built in PC Card interface so I guess that's
supported.
>J.D. "Dutch" Schmidt
>Moderator, Netstumbler Forums
Thanks for the correction.
--
Jeff Liebermann
jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us
150 Felker St #D
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060
http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558