On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 22:51:11 -0700, Todd Allcock
<elecconnec@AmericaOnLine.com> wrote in <esj0pr$tnj$1@aioe.org>:

>At 06 Mar 2007 04:27:46 +0000 John Navas wrote:
>>
>> Fair enough. I travel too, but I care most about coverage in places
>> I use everyday, and I don't expect as much accuracy in rural areas.
>> Different strokes and all that sort of thing?
>
>Have you noticed the Cingular map becoming more "generous" in your area
>lately? It has in mine.
>
>When the street-level detail maps first went on-line, they reported the
>Cingular dead spots in my area that I was familiar with with a great deal
>of accuracy. Today on the maps, these dead-spots now show as having
>"moderate" coverage although nothing seems to have changed in reality-
>those dead spots (including the cul-de-sac I live on) are still dead
>spots!

I hadn't noticed anything like that -- I'll do some checking -- thanks!

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>