In article <c8rpu2dmvat3bpf1r9chpc9j5e39925v6u@4ax.com>,
John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 19:16:27 -0800, Kurt <labolide@spacegmail.com> wrote
> in <labolide-9E9DB1.19162705032007@news.giganews.com>:
>
> >In article <4bjpu2toh66fl9ff4kt1qk5ipbd6mpk14u@4ax.com>,
> > John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
> >> I've found it to be pretty good (albeit not perfect) in the several
> >> areas I've checked here in the San Francisco Bay Area.
>
> >I travel a bit more, so my impressions might be different from yours.
>
> Fair enough. I travel too, but I care most about coverage in places
> I use everyday, and I don't expect as much accuracy in rural areas.
> Different strokes and all that sort of thing?

No, just disappointed with the Cingular map. Was hoping it would be more
accurate.

--
To reply by email, remove the word "space"