On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 12:12:19 -0800, SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com>
wrote in <45edcb29$0$27211$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>:

>Todd Allcock wrote:
>> At 06 Mar 2007 08:20:32 -0800 SMS wrote:
>>
>>> It's not good for business to be honest about your products faults!
>>>
>>> OTOH, T-Mobile continues to be very honest about their network's
>>> coverage.
>>
>> True, but my point was that the Cingular maps were more accurate for my
>> area until recently- if anything, they were understated. I wonder if
>> they've changed their algorhythms too far in the other direction in an
>> attempt to be more accurate. I honestly don't believe they're trying to
>> "snow-job" us with their coverge maps. I was a Cingular customer for a
>> decade in Kansas City prior to moving to Denver, and found their CS to be
>> pretty honest about coverage issues even then.
>
>When I had Cingular CS was very honest about coverage issues. The online
>maps are more of a marketing tool, where it may not pay to be
>excessively honest.

Yet another of your fantasies/fabrications: Online coverage maps are
actually covered by consent decrees, and thus must be accurate.

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>