In article <bujru2dc9g48hli2g02dfinskan083dlbg@4ax.com>,
John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 12:12:19 -0800, SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com>
> wrote in <45edcb29$0$27211$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>:
>
> >Todd Allcock wrote:
> >> At 06 Mar 2007 08:20:32 -0800 SMS wrote:
> >>
> >>> It's not good for business to be honest about your products faults!
> >>>
> >>> OTOH, T-Mobile continues to be very honest about their network's
> >>> coverage.
> >>
> >> True, but my point was that the Cingular maps were more accurate for my
> >> area until recently- if anything, they were understated. I wonder if
> >> they've changed their algorhythms too far in the other direction in an
> >> attempt to be more accurate. I honestly don't believe they're trying to
> >> "snow-job" us with their coverge maps. I was a Cingular customer for a
> >> decade in Kansas City prior to moving to Denver, and found their CS to be
> >> pretty honest about coverage issues even then.
> >
> >When I had Cingular CS was very honest about coverage issues. The online
> >maps are more of a marketing tool, where it may not pay to be
> >excessively honest.
>
> Yet another of your fantasies/fabrications: Online coverage maps are
> actually covered by consent decrees, and thus must be accurate.

Not from my experience. Why not admit that they now may not be as
accurate as they purport?
What's the BFD?

--
To reply by email, remove the word "space"