karlkrandall@sbcglobal.net wrote in
news:179hv2tqskmpbktr289ut0o6asu0qeha4a@4ax.com:

> On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:05:41 -0500, Scott <how.do@you.do> wrote:
>
>>karlkrandall@sbcglobal.net wrote in
>>news:cl2hv297tj7v3sjb1g3n26t5alhkhrrbad@4ax.co m:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> It was fun using the automatic system to get credits for the myriad
>>> dropped calls with Sprint.
>>
>>
>>Admission of fraud- how cavalier, you slug.
>
> Whats fraudulent. All you like to do is insult someone foor leaving
> Sprint? You left Ohio !

Left Ohio? Do you mean left Ohio as in never lived there?


>
>>
>>> But finally the Biodegradable plastic
>>> phones that held a grand total of 8 ringtones was a downer.
>>
>>
>>I see that the urban myths still run rampant in your tiny little
>>brain.
>
> Not Myths, experience with Sanyo phones.

The experience of a single user is hardly authoritative- ask John
Novice.


>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I will always hold corporations to account when they screw up,
>>> rather than look to make excuses for them. And it was ATTWS that
>>> I previously held their feet to the fire.
>>
>>How did they screw up? They were well within their rights to contact
>>you as an existing customer. You were simply looking for a nuisance
>>credit, which is very appropriately named in this case.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Doesn't mean I'm not a happy Cingular customer (jeez anything is
>>> better than Sprint),
>>
>>
>>No- nothing is better than Sprint now that you left.
>
> Funny, Consumer Reports, J.D. Power, and Yankee group have for each of
> the last three years since I left Sprint,
> still rank it WORST in Customer Service. Nothing has changed there.

And the most recently released independent study of dropped calls rated
them higher than Cingular (the self -professed leader). The legacy
Cingular network came in fifth, I believe.

>
>>
>>> and happily awaiting an iPhone.
>>>
>>
>>Good- let me know how the Flinstone technology works for you. I'd
>>rather have cutting-edge technology for that price rather than a
>>repackage of at least ten less-than-$200 phones that I can think of.
>
> Insulting the iPhone cause Sprint can't have one? How lame !!
>
>

How is stating the obvious an insult? The phone will do nothing useful
on the network that any one of about a dozen current production models
and a couple of dozen retired production models of various manufacturers
already do. And any one of those phones can be had for under $200, with
a few available for a little more than $100. Hell, the Razr has the
network functionality of your beloved iPhone. And based on the publicly
acknowledged supply issues Apple is experiencing to manufacture the
phone, the chances of getting a defective phone will be extremely high.

No thanks, I'll pass- I'd rather own a phone that will work and not pay
a price reserved for the clueless.