On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 03:36:50 GMT, "Bob Walker"
<rowalker@sbcglobal.dontspam.com> wrote in
<mb3Kh.3258$Qw.1075@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>:

>"John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
>news:8m3hv29bobach1v6lfck865i5ss82mtfce@4ax.com.. .

>> Actually he did ask for help (a question) -- did you miss the "?",
>> perhaps jumping in mid-thread?
>
>No, I read it from the beginning. His question was whether he would be
>charged for the SMS, not a request for help with call forwarding.

That's not how I saw it. It's still not.

>> In that second part of his post, a vent that had nothing to do with
>> Cingular, it was clear that he hadn't RTFM; hence my suggestion. On
>> some phones, it's possible to shortcut the forwarding process. And with
>> just a bit more effort he would have found that standard GSM codes do
>> work on Cingular.
>
>He was comparing Verizon's functionality with Cingular's. It seems
>appropriate here. It didn't sound like a rant.

That's not how I saw it. It's still not.

>> There's nothing offensive about RTFM.
>
>Really? It seems offensive in a civilized discussion.

Really. There's nothing offensive about RTFM (unless of course you're
determined to take offense).

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>