Yup, navas has forgotten to pop a pill for his menstrual cramp.

In article <mb3Kh.3258$Qw.1075@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
"Bob Walker" <rowalker@sbcglobal.dontspam.com> wrote:

> "John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
> news:8m3hv29bobach1v6lfck865i5ss82mtfce@4ax.com...
> > On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:39:37 -0500, "Bob Walker"
> > <rowalker@dontspamme.sbcglobal.net> wrote in
> > <PT_Jh.9273$P47.9226@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net> :
> >
> >>>>>> Also with verizon If I wanted to forward a call to another number I
> >>>>>> would just enter *72 and the number. But I was told by a friend that
> >>>>>> it
> >>>>>> has to be setup in the phone settings to forward a call and then do
> >>>>>> it
> >>>>>> again in the settings to turn it off. It sounds like a lot of hassle
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>> have to go into the settings every time if this is the case.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Many phones have a menu setting for forwarding calls. RTFM.
> >>>>
> >>>>I did RTFM Jerk. ...
> >>>
> >>> Since you have no manners, I'm not going to waste any more time on you.
> >>> Good luck.
> >
> >>With all due respect, John, it doesn't appear that the OP asked for any
> >>help.
> >
> > Actually he did ask for help (a question) -- did you miss the "?",
> > perhaps jumping in mid-thread?
>
> No, I read it from the beginning. His question was whether he would be
> charged for the SMS, not a request for help with call forwarding.
>
> >
> >>He was just commenting on what he perceived to be Cingular's inferior
> >>process for forwarding calls.
> >
> > In that second part of his post, a vent that had nothing to do with
> > Cingular, it was clear that he hadn't RTFM; hence my suggestion. On
> > some phones, it's possible to shortcut the forwarding process. And with
> > just a bit more effort he would have found that standard GSM codes do
> > work on Cingular.
>
> He was comparing Verizon's functionality with Cingular's. It seems
> appropriate here. It didn't sound like a rant.
>
> >
> >>YOU were the one who was ill-mannered by
> >>interjecting RTFM into the conversation.
> >
> > There's nothing offensive about RTFM.
> >
>
> Really? It seems offensive in a civilized discussion.
>
> > --
> > Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
> > John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>